Warranty Accounting Standards:
Out with the old and in with the new. FIN 45 for product warranties and TB 90-1 for extended warranties have been replaced by the Accounting Standards Codification, a vast yet easy-to-navigate unification of all GAAP standards.
Warranty management has never been easy, but the process of complying with existing accounting standards has gotten much easier. What uses to be a jumble of bulletins, inquiries and statements has been reorganized into a single multi-volume set of standards.
Within that extremely broad set of accounting standards, only a few pages in total pertain to product warranties or extended warranties. Fortunately, those who rewrote the old texts also put the new standards into an easy-to-navigate web index. So following the excerpts that follow was much less difficult than tracking down the old standards they replaced.
Let's start with some acronyms and terminology. In the U.S., most accounting standards come from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), a not-for-profit organization launched in 1973. Technically, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has the responsibility to set accounting standards for publicly-traded companies, but it has usually relied on the private sector, as in the FASB, to do the work.
In the past, the FASB has issued its rules with a somewhat confusing array of acronyms and numbers. Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS or FAS) covered the broadest concepts. For instance, FAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies, was issued in 1975. And then there also were Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, FASB Technical Bulletins, Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts, FASB Staff Positions, and FASB Interpretations.
Old Warranty Accounting Standards
In relation to product warranties, a FASB Interpretation became the most important of all. In November 2002, the group published FASB Interpretation Number 45. The long title was "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others -- an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34." But its nickname was simply FIN 45.
Most of the text of FIN 45 related to guarantees of leases, loans, stock prices, letters of credit, etc., which had more to do with the closure of accounting loopholes exploited by Enron and WorldCom before their collapses than with anything warranty-related. But on a single page, almost as a by-the-way addition, FIN 45 set up two new rules that public companies must follow in its financial statements regarding 1) the inclusion of an explanation of the methodology its finance department uses to establish its warranty reserves, and 2) the disclosure of the balances and net changes to that warranty reserve in the form of a table.
For extended warranties, the FASB Technical Bulletins set the pace for decades. In 1990, the FASB released Technical Bulletin Number 90-1, "Accounting for Separately Priced Extended Warranty and Product Maintenance Contract," which established the accounting rules for deferred revenue and revenue recognition over the life of a service contract.
Basically, it said that the revenue gained from the sale of an extended warranty must be recognized gradually over the life of the contract using the straight-line method, unless a better method more closely tied to actual claims emergence patterns is available.
New Set of Accounting Standards
From 1973 to 2009 an accountant faced a jumble of FAS, FIN, FTB, FSB, and EITF documents. But then in September 2009, the FASB replaced all of these with a single Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, which supersedes all of its previous standards, statements, bulletins and interpretations. The FASB said this major simplification was the result of a major five-year project involving more than 200 people, and was an effort to unite all generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) into one coherent set of rules.
The FASB's ASC is organized into topics with three-digit numbers. For instance, there are nine topics under the heading of "Liabilities," of which ASC Topic 460 - Guarantees, is the most relevant to product warranties. Other topics related to liabilities have their own numbers within the 400 series.
Revenue is the heading of the 600 series. For extended warranties, the most relevant ASC volume is Topic 605 - Revenue Recognition. This new standard supersedes FASB Technical Bulletin Number 90-1.
And then there are some brief references in ASC Topic 460 to ASC Topic 450 - Contingencies, as well as references in ASC Topic 605 to ASC Topic 944 - Financial Services, Insurance. However, most of these citations helpfully repeat what they're referring to and/or define in context the concepts they contain. So it's not an enormous task to follow the narrative.
Within each topic, there are easy to follow subtopics, sections, subsections, and paragraphs. And so, within ASC 460, subtopic 10 is entitled "Overall," and within that subtopic is section 15, "Scope and Scope Extensions." And then subsection 15-9 is a statement about the scope of this standard in regards to product warranties and extended warranties:
ASC 460-10-15-9The guidance in the Product Warranties Subsections applies only to product warranties, which include all of the following:
a. Product warranties issued by the guarantor, regardless of whether the guarantor is required to make payment in services or cash.
b. Separately priced extended warranty or product maintenance contracts.
c. Warranty obligations that are incurred in connection with the sale of the product, that is, obligations that are not separately priced or sold but are included in the sale of the product.
Using the FASB style, this excerpt would be cited as ASC 460-10-15-9, following the topic-subtopic-section-subsection format. As can be readily seen in the text above, ASC 460-10-15-9(a) and (c) define product warranties more or less as they're generally understood by professionals in the warranty industry.
New Rules for Extended Warranties?
Also, if we are interpreting ASC 460-10-15-9(b) correctly, then extended warranties are also within the scope of this standard. If that's so, then this is a really big change, because as we outlined in the Apple and Dell extended warranty newsletters, guarantors have previously not been required to reveal the amount of claims paid in relation to their extended warranty contracts. And since knowledge of the expenses associated with a given program is essential when determining its profitability, this would give observers some inkling of the "loss ratio" of that program.
As can also be seen towards the end of this column below, the recognized revenue requirements of ASC 605 are very similar to those previously detailed in Technical Bulletin No. 90-1. They detail just the rules related to the accounting treatment of the gross amounts paid by customers, and how that revenue must be recognized gradually over the life of the contract. So ASC 460-10-15-9(b) really is something new and different from what was in FIN 45 and TB 90-1.
The rest of ASC Topic 460 is far less inflammatory. In fact, the subsection regarding disclosures for product warranties, ASC 460-10-50-8, repeats more or less verbatim the language used in FIN 45 just over 10 years:
ASC 460-10-50-8A guarantor shall disclose all of the following information for product warranties and other guarantee contracts described in paragraph 460-10-15-9:
a. The information required to be disclosed by paragraph 460-10-50-4 except that a guarantor is not required to disclose the maximum potential amount of future payments specified in paragraph 460-10-50-4(b).
b. The guarantor's accounting policy and methodology used in determining its liability for product warranties (including any liability [such as deferred revenue] associated with extended warranties).
c. A tabular reconciliation of the changes in the guarantor's aggregate product warranty liability for the reporting period. That reconciliation shall include all of the following amounts:
1. The beginning balance of the aggregate product warranty liability
2. The aggregate reductions in that liability for payments made (in cash or in kind) under the warranty
3. The aggregate changes in the liability for accruals related to product warranties issued during the reporting period
4. The aggregate changes in the liability for accruals related to preexisting warranties (including adjustments related to changes in estimates)
5. The ending balance of the aggregate product warranty liability.
Again, it we're reading this correctly, since extended warranties are described by ASC 460-10-15-9(b), then the table described above would be required for extended warranties as well. That would force extended warranty guarantors to reveal payments made (claims) as well as changes in estimates when they over- or under-accrue for expected payments. That would be unprecedented.
Real World Example: HPWhat follows is a real world example of ASC 460-10-50-8 in action. This example is taken from the annual report of Hewlett-Packard Co. for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012. First, here's one of HP's explanations of its methodology:
We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time we recognize revenue. We evaluate our warranty obligations on a product group basis. Our standard product warranty terms generally include post-sales support and repairs or replacement of a product at no additional charge for a specified period of time. While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers, we base our estimated warranty obligation upon warranty terms, ongoing product failure rates, repair costs, product call rates, average cost per call, and current period product shipments. If actual product failure rates, repair rates or any other post sales support costs were to differ from our estimates, we would be required to make revisions to the estimated warranty liability. Warranty terms generally range from 90 days to three years for parts and labor, depending upon the product. Over the last three fiscal years, the annual warranty provision and actual warranty costs have averaged approximately 3.1% of annual net product revenue.
We say it's one of HP's explanations because similarly-worded paragraphs about its warranty accounting policies are sprinkled throughout its latest annual report. But any one paragraph explaining how the company determines the size of its warranty liabilities would fulfill the disclosure requirements of ASC 460-10-50-8(b). And here's HP's warranty table, which fulfills the disclosure requirements of ASC 460-10-50-8(c):
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Note 12: Guarantees
The changes in HP's aggregate product warranty liabilities were as follows for the following fiscal years ended October 31:
Product warranty liability at beginning of year
Accruals for warranties issued
Adjustments related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates)
Settlements made (in cash or in kind)
Product warranty liability at end of year
That's it. That's essentially all it takes to comply with the FASB's warranty accounting rules. Actually, HP provided figures corresponding to subsection 15-9(c) lines 1, 3, 4, 2, and then 5. But as long as it provided all five, that fulfills the requirement.
Of course, there are thousands of moving parts behind those numbers and it takes the work of hundreds of people at both HP and its auditors at Ernst & Young LLP to ensure their accuracy. But the essence of all these FASB warranty standards is to 1) explain how the numbers were produced, and 2) disclose those numbers.
Warranty Week would then divide the amounts in lines 2 and 4 of the table above by HP's product revenue ($77.9 billion in fiscal 2012 vs. $84.8 billion in fiscal 2012) to determine the company's accrual and claims rates, respectively. Those rates were 2.9% accrual and 3.1% claims in 2012 vs. 3.1% for both warranty metrics in fiscal 2011.
Access to FASB Standards
By the way, the text of all of these ASC topics are available for free to those who go through the registration process on this FASB web page. Click on the link on the right for "Order Professional or Basic View" and then follow the links at the bottom for Basic View -- Free Access.
Although basic access to the text is free and open to all who register, all FASB standards are copyrighted and cannot be printed, stored, or reproduced without permission. But as a news publication Warranty Week is claiming the fair use exception to the copyright law for purposes such as criticism, commentary, and news reporting.
We mention that because while putting together last week's newsletter on the business challenges of manufacturer warranties, we couldn't find a single online copy of the warranty-related sections of ASC 460. There were plenty of interpretations, but no excerpts anywhere. So from now on, when we need such a link, we can refer to this week's newsletter. We did the same for FIN 45 almost ten years ago in the June 2, 2003 newsletter.
At the beginning of ASC 460-10-15-9 above, there is a reference to ASC 460-10-50-4 and specifically to ASC 460-10-50-4(b). Just to show everyone that there's nothing mysterious or hidden in those paragraphs, we include them below. And since a warranty guarantor is not required to heed the requirements of ASC 460-10-50-4(b), we've deleted it.
ASC 460-10-50-4A guarantor shall disclose all of the following information about each guarantee, or each group of similar guarantees, even if the likelihood of the guarantor's having to make any payments under the guarantee is remote:
Disclosures About a Guarantor's Obligation
a. The nature of the guarantee, including all of the following:
1. The approximate term of the guaranteeb. [editor: this item was deleted because product warranties are exempt from these requirements]
2. How the guarantee arose
3. The events or circumstances that would require the guarantor to perform under the guarantee
4. The current status (that is, as of the date of the statement of financial position) of the payment/performance risk of the guarantee (for example, the current status of the payment/performance risk of a credit-risk-related guarantee could be based on either recently issued external credit ratings or current internal groupings used by the guarantor to manage its risk)
5. If the entity uses internal groupings for purposes of item (a)(4), how those groupings are determined and used for managing risk.
c. The current carrying amount of the liability, if any, for the guarantor's obligations under the guarantee (including the amount, if any, recognized under Section 450-20-30), regardless of whether the guarantee is freestanding or embedded in another contract
d. The nature of any recourse provisions that would enable the guarantor to recover from third parties any of the amounts paid under the guarantee
e. The nature of any assets held either as collateral or by third parties that, upon the occurrence of any triggering event or condition under the guarantee, the guarantor can obtain and liquidate to recover all or a portion of the amounts paid under the guarantee
f. If estimable, the approximate extent to which the proceeds from liquidation of assets held either as collateral or by third parties would be expected to cover the maximum potential amount of future payments under the guarantee.
In truth, not much of this subsection relates to product warranties at all. But we include it here because the standard makes an ominous reference to it.
Elsewhere, there is a puzzling reference to performance warranties included in another subsection. And then that makes a reference to yet another subsection. We include excerpts of both below.
Performance warranties are generally guarantees that are extended by manufacturers of jet engines and other types of motors and engines. They usually specify measurements such as maximum fuel usage or uptime. If these quotas are not met, the manufacturer may need to compensate the customer, who is usually a fleet manager or a large corporation.
Subsections ASC 460-10-55-28 and 460-10-55-29 provide implementation guidance for performance warranties. Subsection 55-28 says what they are, and Subsection 55-29 says what they're not:
55-28 A representation by a manufacturer to its customer that a particular engine would produce a specified savings in its energy consumption qualifies for the scope exception in paragraph 460-10-25-1(b) because that representation relates to how efficiently the engine operates.
55-29 In contrast, a service provider's representation as to the quality of its services does not need to qualify for that scope exception because it is a guarantee of the service provider's (guarantor's) future performance and, as such, is excluded from the scope of this Topic by paragraph 460-10-15-7(i).
For the sake of completeness, here's the text of the exception specifically referred to above, which somewhat overlaps with the language of other sections that also exempt product warranties from the range of disclosures faced by other forms of guarantees:
ASC 460-10-25-125-1 The following types of guarantees are not subject to the recognition provisions of this Subsection:
b. A product warranty or other guarantee for which the underlying is related to the performance (regarding function, not price) of nonfinancial assets that are owned by the guaranteed party (see paragraph 460-10-15-9 for related guidance).
There is also a section in ASC 460 which makes references to ASC 450 - Contingencies. As Chris Walker and Scott Cederburg of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP detailed in last week's newsletter, there are numerous ways for a manufacturer to estimate future warranty expenses, especially when it comes to new product launches, goodwill claims, and safety recalls. Much of this is outside the scope of the formal standards.
Still, the underlying message of ASC 450 and ASC 460 is to do the best you can, even if that means taking a wild guess or copying a competitor. And if you can't take a guess, then maybe you should defer recognition of all a product's revenue until its warranty expires and you can say for certain, in the past tense, how much it actually cost to repair. For most companies, that is not an option, which is why accurate accrual estimates are such a sought-after skill.
Here's what ASC 460 has to say about estimating warranty accruals:
ASC 460-10-25-5 to 25-8Warranty Obligations Incurred in Connection with the Sale of Goods or Services
25-5 Because of the uncertainty surrounding claims that may be made under warranties, warranty obligations fall within the definition of a contingency. Losses from warranty obligations shall be accrued when the conditions in paragraph 450-20-25-2 are met.
25-6 The condition in paragraph 450-20-25-2(a) is met at the date of an entity's financial statements if, based on available information, it is probable that customers will make claims under warranties relating to goods or services that have been sold. Satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 450-20-25-2(b) will normally depend on the experience of an entity or other information. In the case of an entity that has no experience of its own, reference to the experience of other entities in the same business may be appropriate. Inability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of a warranty obligation at the time of sale because of significant uncertainty about possible claims (that is, failure to satisfy condition [b] in that paragraph) precludes accrual and, if the range of possible loss is wide, may raise a question about whether a sale should be recorded before expiration of the warranty period or until sufficient experience has been gained to permit a reasonable estimate of the obligation.
25-7 The conditions in paragraph 450-20-25-2 may be considered in relation to individual sales made with warranties or in relation to groups of similar types of sales made with warranties. If those conditions are met, accrual shall be made even though the particular parties that will make claims under warranties may not be identifiable.
Separately Priced Extended Warranty or Product Maintenance Contracts
25-8 Paragraphs 605-20-25-1 through 25-6 provide guidance on revenue recognition by sellers of extended warranty or product maintenance contracts.
And here's what these paragraphs are referring to. First, the references to ASC Topic 450 - Contingencies:
ASC 450-20-25-2An estimated loss from a loss contingency shall be accrued by a charge to income if both of the following conditions are met:
a. Information available before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25 indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements. Date of the financial statements means the end of the most recent accounting period for which financial statements are being presented. It is implicit in this condition that it must be probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of the loss.
b. The amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Finally, here are the references made above in 25-8 to certain subsections of ASC Topic 605 - Revenue Recognition. These are essentially the new rules for extended warranty revenue recognition, which have now superseded those in FASB Technical Bulletin No. 90-1:
ASC 605-20-25-1 to 25-6
Revenue Recognition, Services
25-1 Some products include warranty obligations that are incurred in connection with the sale of the product, that is, obligations that are not separately priced or sold but are included in the sale of the product. The accounting for these is described in Topic 450. Separately priced contracts for extended warranty and product maintenance contracts provide warranty protection or product services and the contract price of these contracts is not included in the original price of the product covered by the contracts.
25-2 Accounting for extended warranty and product maintenance contracts follows an approach similar to that described in the Short-Duration Contracts Subsection of Section 944-605-25 for short-duration insurance contracts. Like short-duration insurance contracts, extended warranty and product maintenance contracts provide coverage against the risk of certain specified claim costs for a specified period. Those claim costs may take the form of repair costs if the product requires repair or service costs if the customer requests that a covered service be performed on the product. Paragraph 944-605-25-1 indicates that premiums from short-duration insurance contracts should be recognized as revenue over the period of the contract in proportion to the amount of insurance protection provided. That generally results in premiums being recognized as revenue evenly over the contract period.
25-3 Sellers of extended warranty or product maintenance contracts have an obligation to the buyer to perform services throughout the period of the contract and, therefore, revenue shall be recognized in income over the period in which the seller is obligated to perform. That is, revenue from separately priced extended warranty and product maintenance contracts shall be deferred and recognized in income on a straight-line basis over the contract period except in those circumstances in which sufficient historical evidence indicates that the costs of performing services under the contract are incurred on other than a straight-line basis. In those circumstances, revenue shall be recognized over the contract period in proportion to the costs expected to be incurred in performing services under the contract.
25-4 Costs that are directly related to the acquisition of a contract and that would have not been incurred but for the acquisition of that contract (incremental direct acquisition costs) shall be deferred and charged to expense in proportion to the revenue recognized. All other costs, such as costs of services performed under the contract, general and administrative expenses, advertising expenses, and costs associated with the negotiation of a contract that is not consummated, shall be charged to expense as incurred.
25-5 The pattern of cost incurrence may vary depending on characteristics of the product or may be a function of the coverage provided under the contract. When the coverage under the contract varies, such as those situations in which the period of the extended warranty partially overlaps the period of the product's original warranty, or the extended warranty contains a graduating deductible, costs of providing services under the contract may vary proportionate to that coverage.
25-6 A loss shall be recognized on extended warranty or product maintenance contracts if the sum of expected costs of providing services under the contracts and unamortized acquisition costs exceeds related unearned revenue. Extended warranty or product maintenance contracts shall be grouped in a consistent manner to determine if a loss exists. A loss shall be recognized first by charging any unamortized acquisition costs to expense. If the loss is greater than the unamortized acquisition costs, a liability shall be recognized for the excess.
There's a pair of references in the above text to ASC Topic 944 - Financial Services, Insurance, which we won't include here because the above text paraphrases them so well. Basically, these texts are saying that while extended warranties aren't insurance contracts, they can be treated like short-term insurance contracts, because they involve claims, risks and premiums.
We think this language is unfortunate, because extended warranty administrators and their legal representatives have done a remarkable job of convincing state lawmakers to not treat them like short-term insurance companies. But now, with the premier maker of accounting standards suggesting that extended warranties are a lot like a short-term insurance contracts, because they "provide coverage against the risk of certain specified claim costs for a specified period," that argument gets harder to make.
Warranty or Insurance?
For instance, although most extended warranty administrators have successfully navigated the intricacies of adding accidental damage protection clauses to their laptop computer service contracts without being reclassified as insurance in most states, they failed to gain the same exemption with mobile phone plans that go several steps further and add loss and theft to the list of covered perils. Those are commonly called cell phone insurance contracts. They're not merely like insurance. They are insurance.
But anyway, we're not lawyers. And we're not accountants. So please don't let this newsletter substitute for professional advice. Manufacturers and administrators would be reckless to take action based on our interpretations of the FASB's warranty accounting standards. The best course of action would be for all warranty professionals to go to fasb.org and sign up for a free Basic Access account on the website, and follow the links to the ASC standards yourself.